Every
four (or two, or whatever it is nowadays) years, my wife watches the
Olympics. So I watch it as well.i
I'm too lazy to change to a real program – not that there is any –
and I'm far too smart to make an issue over the choice. I see the
same ads over and over again, and there is an occasional event shown.
The events themselves, however, on occasion seem strange. But I'm
getting ahead of myself.
The
Olympics are said to have been organized originally in the eighth
century BCEii
– at least that's what the history books say – but they probably
started earlier, and they only achieved real popularity a few
centuries later. They were dedicated to the gods on Mount Olympus
and their goal was to solidify the relation between between the
various city-states of what is now Greece. In fact, during the games
wars were put on hold. The medium was sports, including events like
the javelin throw which, notwithstanding the suspension of such
activities during the games, mimicked the activities of war. The
prizes were quite modest – crowns of olive branches and artistic
tributes like statues and poetic tributes. With the rise of
Christianity, however, celebrations of pagan gods doomed the games
and at the end of the fourth century CE Theodosius banned them.
Fast
forward to the end of the nineteenth century: the reconstitution of
the Olympics.iii
And, since 1896, after being revived by de Coubertin, the Olympics
have been held every four years, except for the war years.iv
But from 1896 to now there has been a sad deterioration of the games
– not commercially of course, but in terms of the ideals that had
inspired them. For example, instead of stopping war to compete, the
games were suspended to allow for the pursuit of war.
What
were those ideals? The Olympic movement prides itself on promoting a
holistic philosophy: “Olympism is a
philosophy of life, exalting and combining in a balanced whole the
qualities of body, will and mind. Blending sport with culture and
education, Olympism seeks to create a way of life based on the joy of
effort, the educational value of good example, social responsibility
and respect for universal fundamental ethical principles.”v
In view of such ideals, and the sentiment that sport should be
accompanied by social responsibility and ethical principles, the need
to ban certain substances, and the penalties for cheating and
throwing events are hard to understand. And while the spirit of
competition is to be commended, participation should be accompanied
by “a spirit of friendship,
solidarity and fair play.”vi
From what I've observed, those ideals are often lacking, and the
Guinness Book of World Records is more of a motivation for the
athletes than the Olympic Charter.
But
it is not fair to blame the participants when the games themselves
have changed and when the Olympic Committee has interests and
prejudices of its own. According to the Council of Europe, “'Sport'
means all forms of physical activityvii
which, through casual or organised participation, aim at expressing
or improving physical fitness and mental well-being, forming social
relationships or obtaining results in competition at all levels.”viii
We also understand the term to refer to the kinds of physical
competitions that have primarily athletic, rather than entertainment,
value. So such “sports” as synchronized swimming and diving,
dressage and ice dancing don't seem, on the surface, to reflect what
Coubertin may have had in mind.ix
Training, often arduous, is an important component, as is the sense
of competition. But they do not define sport.x
Rather,
the Committee has chosen to use commercial licensing and
profit-making as the criteria for its choices. Amateur status used
to be demanded of participantsxi
but that limitation has been abandoned because professionals provide
more excitement and revenues than amateurs. Television rights are
now a critical property, and advertisements and fluff take up more
time than the actual events. In addition, fireworks-filled
ceremonials and displays are certain to draw big audiences. And so
as to keep the consciousness of the events ever in our minds, and to
keep the revenues flowing, the Olympics are now featured every other
year instead of every four years.
Even
the Olympic logo belies the stated goals of the Charter. The five
rings are said to symbolize the world's continents. There are,
however, seven continents
– a fact of which the
Committee must be aware. It may be argued that there are no
participants from Antarctica, but it is hard to maintain the same
position in regard to Australia. A new symbol, though, probably
wouldn't be as striking as the one now in use, and would lose some of
its commercial value.
Perhaps the worst of the offenses of the organizers, though, is the
politicization of the games. According to the Olympic Charter, “The
Olympic Games are competitions between athletes in individual or team
events and not between countries,”
yet the prizes seem to be awarded by countries with national anthems
an important feature. Medal counts and media coverage also seem to focus on international rivalries. And “Any
form of discrimination with regard to a country or a person on
grounds of race, religion, politics, gender or otherwise is
incompatible with belonging to the Olympic Movement.”
Yet despite the long memory of ancient games, officials seem to be
unable to remember the more recent murder of Israeli athletes and
coaches in Munich at the 1972 games, nor to pay any tribute to them
in the extensive pageantry in which the games glory.xii
Many people consider this to be a slap at a particular people and a
particular country, illustrating the prejudices of the organizers.
As does their readiness to erect a barrier so that Lebanese athletes
wouldn't have to see or acknowledge the presence of the Israeli
athletes. The world reacted with horror when the Israelis
constructed a barrier to keep them safe from terrorist attacks, and
it was decried by an angry world. But the reaction to a direct
violation of Olympic principles by the Olympic Committee itself in
the building of a barrier to exclude Israelis is of no consequence.
Clearly the Committee doesn't view such an action as a “form
of discrimination with regard to a country.”
The
committee will condemn the acts of others while never considering its
own hypocrisy and the violation of its own rules. So why should we
demand more of the athletes. And we who watch should not condemn
either the organizers or the athletes. Not as long as we ourselves
keep watching and admiring the Olympic Spirit.
Next
episode: “Jeremy Bentham And The Mars Rover” – On the
uses of money.
i I'm
writing this on August 7th, although it won't appear for
a few weeks.
ii Specifically
776 BCE.
iii There
had been attempts to hold similar celebrations in between –
including one on the heels of the French Revolution – but they
were short-lived.
iv Fealty
to the gods may have been a motivating force for the Greeks, but
religion played no part in the modern games. Or so they claimed.
v As
stated in the Olympic Charter.
vi Ibid.
“Fundamental Principles, Number 6.
vii Air rifle shooting may require a good deal of concentration, good vision, and steady hands, but it is not what would come to mind immediately as a physical sport.
viii European
Sports Charter, Article 2, 1a.
ix It
also seems unlikely that he would have listed beach volley ball
among his favorites.
x A
lot of training is necessary to win a hot dog eating contest or a
chess match, and “road rage” is certainly the result of an
overly competitive spirit, but none qualifies as an Olympic sport.
Nor do we see, at least not this year, dancing with the stars.
xi Jim
Thorpe, described by King Gustav V of Sweden as the greatest athlete
in the world, was stripped of his Olympic medals because he had
played professional baseball and that was enough reason to consider
him a professional and ineligible for Olympic participation even
though he competed in track and field.
xii Indeed,
the Munich games went on after the murders as if nothing had
happened.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.