It's
all a blur. I don't know what I've said so far. (Not today, but in
general.) I do know that there remains a lot more but, as I've noted
before, I'll never get there so I'm declaring it hefker.i
What
follow are some thoughts that I don't expect to have time to develop
in the near future. Whether or not I've raised these issues in the
past, there's still a universe of additional thoughts to be
discussed, and I leave that to you.
-
- - - - - - - - - - - -
1. Suppose
the Universe (there's that word again), having expanded after the Big
Bang, reached a maximum and started collapsing. Suppose
unidirectional time which, according to some physicists, started at
the time of the BB, turned around as the Universe started collapsing
and, while it is still unidirectional, is now moving from a time when
there was much information to a time when little is known – when
past and future (as we know them) are reversed. And billions of
years from now the same people who once lived (who live now) live
again – only the direction of their lives is reversed.
As
the days pass, we forget much of what we knew, only remembering what
we personally experienced. Now “progress” has a meaning opposite
to what we understand. For example, as time goes by the iPod which
someone had used a few years earlier no longer exists and he can only
remember that there was such a device at one time. And while his
retirement is over he becomes younger and his own children disappear
while his parents become a more important part of his life. He is
aware of the sequence (it is the normal one) and tells his parents
what life was like when he was old. Birth is the termination of his
life – his death having been its beginning.
2. According
to a guy I know in my community, a dog is man's best friend. His
criterion? Lock your dog and your wife in the basement. If you open
the door after three days, only one will be glad to see you. There
must be other benchmarks by which to evaluate such affection, or any
other variety, but I have no time to consider the problem now. Maybe
I'll get some help in three days.
3. They
mustn't win – When is showing that they
haven't won more important than your own personal interests? Are
there other times when you gain more from losing than from winning.
One is to get a better choice in a sports draft, but there must be
others. Another is in the effort to gain sympathy. And when must
you do something you wouldn't ordinarily do just to show that you
can?
4. In
a rational scientific Universe, one that originated with the Big
Bang, how do we account for the laws of physics. The scenarios
explaining the development of the various features of the reality in
which we live are based on the existence of such laws – which
apparently waited for the Big Bang so they would have something on
which to act – but their existence, which assumes that there was
something before the origination/creation seems to be separate from
the Universe in which they operate.
Have
at it. I'll be interested in your results.
Next
episode: “Andrew And Greta” – No one to watch over me.
iOwnerless
(Hebrew). Available to whoever claims it. And whoever uses it can
change it as seems fit.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.