OK.
Pop quiz.
Get
out your number two pencils. (Do they still use number two pencils?
Do they still make pencils?)
Over
the past few years there's been plenty of news coming from the Middle
East, accompanied by extensive invective. It's been hard to separate
the problems and to decide what we, and the participants, should be
doing. In order to clarify everyone's thinking on the subject I've
prepared a set of questions that may illuminate some of the issues.
This is an open-book test and you're encouraged to use any
publications of the United Nations, the European Union, and the
Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions Movement. No other references
will be permitted. The examination will consist of the presentation
of realistic situations – some already experienced – followed by
possible responses. You are expected to be fair to all participants
and to follow moral guidelines. Two subjects are covered:
proportionality and moral equivalency. Since it is often difficult
to separate them, no attempt has been made to do so. But in all
instances you should look for the proportional and morally equivalent
action.
You are a soldier, standing in a crowd
at a bus stop. An automobile heads directly into the crowd running
over, and possibly killing several people. The car stops and the
driver exits with a hatchet. He then starts running after
bystanders.
Do
you
a. shoot
the man with the hatchet,
b. protect
the man from the enraged crowd,
c. help
the man escape from the mob, or
d. run
home, get your car, and look for a crowd in his neighborhood?
Three Israeli soldiers are approached
by a civilian Arab family. The mother pulls a pair of scissors from
under her clothing and stabs and kills one of the soldiers. The
other family members (including four children) reach into their
clothing.
Should
the remaining soldiers
a. flee,
b. shoot
the woman,
c. shoot
the entire family, or
d. run
home and get a pair of scissors?
An Israeli soldier comes under attack
by a mob that corners him. He is armed with an automatic weapon.
The mob begins throwing stones and Molotov cocktails at him.
Should
his response be to
a. advise
the mob that their acts are illegal,
b. fire
at the advancing crowd,
c. pick
up some stones and throw them back, or
d. consult
his procedure manual for what would be approved?
Jihadists in Gaza send unguided
missiles into Israel. They are aimed in the vicinity of a school but
land in an adjacent field.
An
appropriate response by Israel would be to
a. ignore
the attack since no one was killed,
b. use
the Iron Dome system to prevent future attacks,
c. remove
any guidance systems from their missiles in order to ensure a level
playing field if they return fire, or
d. target
and attack the site from which the missiles were launched?
If in the previous scenario the attack
came from a United Nations hospital which the terrorists were using
as a military base, and if children in the school in Israel were
killed
Should
the response be to
a. consult
the United Nations about the incident,
b. use
the Iron Dome system to prevent future attacks,
c. return
fire upon the source of the missiles irrespective of collateral
damage, or
d. attack
a nearby school in order to kill children and even the score?
BONUS
QUESTIONS
a. Which
of the above instances merits a UN or EU condemnation of Israel?
b. Which
Israeli(s) should be brought before the International Court for war
crimes?
c. In
which cases are BDS actions not warranted?
d. Wouldn't
all of the world's problems disappear if there were no Israel?
Think
about these questions and answer them. The answers are obvious, but
you have to reach them yourself – although the permitted references
will certainly guide you to the truth. After all, we've known for
millennia how to bring morality, pea,ce and goodwill to the globe on
which we live.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.