At
a time when she lacked the trust of most Americans, when indictment
was being considered against her, President Obama said of the former
Secretary of State
There has never been any man or
woman more qualified for this office than Hillary Clinton, and that's
the truth. That's the truth.
He
said it at a rally in North Carolina.
George
Washington always told the truth – we're informed that “he
couldn't tell a lie” – and he was an above-average president.
According to the incumbent, however, he was less qualified than the
current Democratic candidate. While it may be true that she is more
capable than the one praising her, it's hard not to wonder if
Lincoln, Adams, Jefferson, or a host of others might not have had a
better résumé or greater
reliability than the former Secretary.
It's
easy to chalk it up to campaign rhetoric. You'd have to. After all,
in 2008, the candidate Senator Obama, maintained that she, (then his
colleague in the Senate) Hillary Clinton, was “willing to say
anything
[in case you didn't get what he meant, that's a euphemism for “to
lie”] to get elected.” He had other
reservations about her qualifications then. Now – perhaps feeling
a debt incurred by her service to him – he seems willing
to say anything to get her
elected. (Neither her, nor his, lying seems to be a
disqualifying feature.) That's what makes America great. Loyalty.
To party members if not the Constitution, the citizens, and the
country.
It's
an effort to inspire confidence in her at a time when she lacks the
trust of a majority of our citizens. Perhaps it's her own fault,
perhaps it's his. Perhaps it's the fault of the American people at
this point in history, but there's no denying that she has neither
their friendship nor what they consider the qualifications to lead us
all.
Nor
does her opponent.
Sadly,
it's a given that we cannot believe what politicians say. In theory
their calling, their burden, is to perform service for their country
– to improve the lot of their people – even if there is a cost to
themselves. Just as our “citizen soldiers” have fought to
protect us, our “citizen politicians” claim to be willing to
sacrifice for us, and it's something we need them to do. The
reality, however, doesn't match that theory. The driving forces are,
more often, ego, lust for power, and money. These are the rewards of
office. And too many of our leaders are in it for the rewards rather
than the burdens.
And
we are willing, though unindicted, co-conspirators. We accept their
words, if not as the truth, as unexceptionable rhetoric. We expect
it. (All politicians are liars.) True, some of the media do some
“fact-checking,” but who cares? We continue to elect those we
know to be falsifying, “spinning,” or inventing “facts.”
They're flexible and so are we.
The
time has come, however, to fight back. It will probably be a losing
fight – certainly initially it will be – but it's a necessary one
if we are to restore “a government of the people.” The time has
come when people should vote their consciences – not according to
party line. It may be easier to have only two parties from which to
choose, but it forces us to accept “the lesser of evils” too
often – to brook evil. This is a democracy, and we are free to
choose.
But
we're not the only democracy. There are countries in which parties
are formed based on beliefs that may differ from the mainstream;
where a difference of opinion, or an antipathy to those running, may
inspire the formation of a new political entity, more suitable to
public wishes. There's no guarantee that its leaders won't lie, but
when it's discovered that they can't be trusted there's precedent for
dumping them and starting again. It's messy, but democracy is messy.
(Mussolini may have gotten the trains to run on time [actually, he
didn't] but it was at great cost.)
In
the United States the step to take is to vote for a third party (as I
intend to do). There aren't many around, and they're not likely to
win, but votes that don't go to major party candidates are a message
– one that we hope ultimately will be heard if sent often enough.
As
Pogo (the voice of Walt Kelly) said
We have met the enemy and he is us.
And
those we're willing to elect.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.