It
just began last week, but even before the official opening ceremonies
they were already competing. And the first gold medal went to Ginny
Thrasher in the Women's BB gun competition. I know they call it an
“air rifle” now, but let's be frank: it's a BB gun. Euphemisms
be damned.
Would
the Greek gods have used BB guns to defend Mount Olympus? I'm not
sure, but I really doubt it. In all likelihood they'd have had other
things on their minds. They'd probably have been more interested in
playing volleyball on some Aegean beach, or, perhaps, golfing in (what is now)
Thessaloniki.
That
isn't what you think of when you ponder the Olympics? It's not my
idea either. Neither am I sure that the Greek gods would recognize
the modern Olympic Games. But that's what there is nowadays. Beach
volleyball, along with the track and field, swimming, tennis, soccer,
water polo, and a host of other events that expand the schedule. And
even if they're on the golf course, now between ads, human interest
material (not that the immortal ones are especially interested in
humans), and other fillers, the gods would be able to watch the games
on their iPads – or whatever they're called in Greek.
Things
have changed over the millennia. Back in the old days – three
thousand years ago, give or take – the games were utilized in order
to promote Hellenic unity – “pan-hellenism – since the numerous
independent city-states in the area were always at war. They were
held every four years and included track, equestrian events
(including chariot races after a while), and self-defense
competitions like boxing and wrestling. Because it was a goal to
promote unity, wars were not fought at the time of the contests. Nor
was there battle for a while before and after the events, so as to
give participants and spectators a chance to travel to and from the
site of the competition safely. There was a sacred truce. And the
games' success, both as sport and as an instrument of peace, led to
the establishment of similar contests elsewhere in the region: in
Delphi, Corinth, and Nemea at various times during the Olympiad –
the four year period between Olympic games. Musical programs took
place at Delphi, and dance, poetry, and drama presentations also
occurred, although they were not a feature of the games at Olympia.
Leo Arnaud's music certainly wasn't a feature, nor the pomp of the
opening ceremonies, or the art exhibitions featured in some of the
modern games. That's entertainment.
I
don't know how much corruption was involved then, but now the records
for are truly impressive. Because of the anticipated revenues from
tourism, there is bribery of Olympic officials by those desiring to
hold the games in their cities (although they never seem to finish
preparations on time, and the illusion of riches doesn't always
reflect the reality). As a result, many officials have gotten rich
in the modern world. They can swing a good deal of revenue to the
place awarded the event. When the games were in fixed locations,
that wasn't a problem.
As
for steroids and other “performance-enhancing” drugs, I doubt
that they were an issue. Even if some herbs were believed to make
one a better athlete, that was considered desirable. And how would
they have tested for illegal substances anyway?
All
in all, it's hard not to conclude that the ancient games were far
more in keeping with the idea of what they should be than the ones we
hold now. Apart from the fact that they were men-only events. There
was no debating over the issue of amateur versus professional when it
came to determining eligibility – although we've stopped worrying
about that. And the idea that a truce accompanied each set of games
is very appealing, one that might benefit us. It's certainly
something to think about. For the most part, I consider the games to
be an overly long waste of time, but if wars did not take place
during the competitions I'd be willing to accept wall-to-wall
Olympics. Even with the bizarre events that they've interpolated
into them. As a matter of fact, why not Olympic three-legged races?
I
never thought I'd say that.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.