I
have a dream. Chances are it's not your dream. In fact you'd
probably abhor it, and condemn me for having it. In my dream,
there's no penalty for calling someone a “nigger” or a “guinea”
or a “spic.” There are Boy Scout troops that prohibit
homosexuals, and colleges that don't admit women. I dream of
segregated lunch counters and hotels that prohibit Jews. As I said,
it's my dream, not yours.
Let
me begin with the disclaimers: I'm a kike,i
a neocon, and I'm an old man. Thus I'm disqualified when it comes to
saying anything intelligent about our modern, democratic, Christian
society. But I won't let your biases stop me. I have my own views
and I have my own blog. If you don't want to read it, that's your
right. So if you want you can stop right now. Your loss.
The
bases for my views are the Declaration of Independence and the United
States Constitution. They're documents once revered, but now viewed
as antiques which may only be cited in patriotic speeches since
they're so out of date that they can't be taken seriously any more.ii
Yet they remain the foundation of the world's oldest constitutional
republic. Whatever their imperfections, they work.
The
principles, doctrines, and laws they contain, however, apply only to
the government. The private sector has – or, at least, should have
– considerably more latitude.iii
The rights of the individual as opposed to those of our government
constitute an important distinction, one of which we should all be
aware, and one that is part of the structure of the American dream.
It matters. It helps keep our republic alive, and, as Martin Luther
King said, “Our
lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that
matter.”
Thus
I will not be silent. I will speak out for prejudice, hate speech,
and segregation.iv
It's
not that I support those positions. I don't. But that's my choice,
and should not limit the rights of others.v
I fully believe that there are acts permitted to “private”
individuals and organizations that would be viewed as
unconstitutional or contrary to law when involving “public” ones.
The governmentvi
should not attempt to control what anyone thinks, says, or even does
as a private individual, unless his actions directly or indirectly
cause physical damage to others. And then he should be punished for
the harm he has caused – not for the thoughts or words.
So
let me get back to my dream, for I have only related part of it.
In
my dream, there's no penalty for calling someone a “nigger” or a
“guinea” or a “spic.” There are Boy Scout troops that
prohibit homosexuals, and colleges that don't admit women. I dream
of segregated lunch counters and hotels that prohibit Jews. But
there are few who use epithets and a diminishing number of those who
listen. The insults have lost their sting because they elicit little
response. Human nature may not change but inhumane actions may.
In
my dream, also, the segregated Boy Scout troops, colleges, lunch
counters and hotels are open but empty. No one is interested. And
there are numerous alternatives, public and private, to those
facilities, some with and some without governmental funding, that
provide equal accommodation to all takers. The change will take place
because of economics rather than compulsion. People's actions will
change as they forget the old, and unrewarding, practices. Even
their prejudices will fade as they learn that no one is interested,
and that it is more productive to move on.
As
Reverend King said, our children “will one day live in a nation
where they will not be judged by the color of their skinvii
but by the content of their character.” Nowhere in his “I have a
dream” addressviii
did he suggest that people should be forced to act properly. He knew
too much about our weaknesses to even suggest that. His hopes were
pragmatic as well as idealistic.
Perhaps
we share a dream.
Next
episode: “Take It From Whomever”
– Everything you may or may not have wanted to know but didn't have time to ask.
i That's
not the way I view myself, but I know there are many who see me that
way. And that's their right according to the Constitution.
ii In
fact, I'd bring them up to date myself if I could. But for now they
remain in effect.
iii Hillsdale
College (and, perhaps, others more recently) refuses all government
support and declines to participate in any governmental programs, so
that it will not be subject to any strictures that derive from
involvement in any relationship with it. The college is a strong
supporter of the Constitution, and prides itself on its independent
status and its refusal to sell or compromise that independence from
governmental regulations while enjoying the liberties guaranteed it
by our Founding Fathers.
iv Actually
I view arrogance, corruption, violation of the ten commandments, and
complicity in the seven deadly sins as greater threats to our
republic than these.
v When
their actions are unrelated to, and not dependent on, any
governmental authorization. Our ancestors recognized and accepted
what we find intolerable: you can't change human nature. It has to
change itself. The best you can do is to make it clear that society
itself is proscribed from involvement in immorality.
vi And
self-appointed censors.
vii Nor
sex or religion or any other such extraneous criterion.