“In
the Beginning G-d created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was
without form. … And the evening and the morning were the first
day.”i
In
the beginning the particle appeared. And, in accordance with the
laws of physics, the Big Bang turned it into the universe that houses
everything. Before that happened, time didn't exist. Nor did
anything else.
“Who
really knows, and who can swear, how creation came, when or where!
Even gods came after creation’s day. Who really knows, who can
truly say when and how did creation start? Did He do it? Or did He
not? Only He, up there, knows, maybe; or perhaps, not even He.”ii
“There was something
featureless yet complete, born before heaven and earth; Silent –
amorphous – it stood alone and unchanging. We may regard it as the
mother of heaven and earth. Not knowing its name, I style it the
'Way.' ... The Way gave birth to unity, Unity gave birth to duality,
Duality gave birth to trinity, Trinity gave birth to the myriad
creatures. The myriad creatures bear yin on their back and embrace
yang in their bosoms. They neutralize these vapors and
thereby achieve harmony.”iii
*********************************
The
first of these descriptions of the beginning comes from the King
James Bible; the third from the Rig Veda, and describes a Hindu
version; the fourth is from Daodejing – one of many Chinese
cosmogonies. Around the world there are, of course, numerous other
versions of the unknowable, the discussion of the origin of
everything. They represent what is known as “Creation Myths”iv
and are matters of belief – no one really knows the facts.v
Interestingly,
the second version described above, the scientific view, seems just
as mystical as the others. Notwithstanding any mathematical
calculations and any theories of physics, it is as unprovable as any
of them and just as reliant on beliefvi
– in this case the beliefs of “rational” mathematicians and
scientists.
But
belief can have dangerous consequences.
An
important part of the religious narrative, at least in the traditions
that stem from the Jewish Bible,vii
is the concept that Creation took six days and G-d rested on the
seventh. And He commanded us to rest on that day as well. That
seventh day is usually termed Saturday and corresponds to the
Sabbathviii
which is divinely ordained. The idea of a day of rest, though it has
gained widespread acceptance, has not been viewed with favor
universally.ix
A
few years agox
I wrote an essay on the calendar. One of the points that it made was
that “universal” calendars favored the elimination of the seven
day week as he sole basis for construction of the “year.” Rather, they
employ such a week for the purpose of general organization, but
because a “perfect” yearxi
is required – usually with 52 seven day weeks always beginning and
usually beginning on Sunday – it's necessary to slip in one or more
days that won't be counted. They're days off. And who can argue
with an extra day or more of rest. But the extra day (or days)
shifts the Sabbath each year, and that's unacceptable to those who
observe it. Supporters of a universal calendar, however, demean
those who favor a Sabbath. From their perspective, a day off is a
useful and modern labor benefit; the Sabbath is a remnant of the
outdated mythology of a bigot. (That perspective is, however,
evidence of their own biases.)
Believers,
though, have different views. Indeed, they often are
bigots.
One
instance involves some Jews who have difficulty tolerating the
violation of the Sabbathxii
by other Jews. They may throw stones at the vehicles of those who
drive on the day of rest, or simply castigate those whom they deem
insufficiently observant. It's not an action, however, that is
generally approved by others – even those who may agree concerning
the specifics of the violations.
Of
far greater concern, however, is the urge to impose the religious
statutes of one religion on another, or to use the Sabbath for the
purposes of incitement against those of other faiths. In medieval
Rome, for example, especially when all the city's Jews were forced to
live in a ghetto, those same Jews were required to listen to a Sunday
Christian sermon which described their evils and the goodness of the
Church. Following the sermon, the killing of the evil ones sometimes
occurred – most notably on Easter to deal with those who, according
to their teachings, had killed G-d, as if that were possible. It was
an example of anti-semitism in a form that was sanctioned by
Christianity, and was aimed at using the day of “rest” to
intimidate, and sometimes to eliminate, those who did not share its
views. (Regrettably it was a practice not limited to Rome.)
But,
as the saying goes, “that was then ...” Unfortunately, things
haven't changed. Or perhaps they've gotten worse. Anti-semitism
flourishes. There's an opinion piece in yesterday's Wall Street
Journal entitled “Do Jews Have a Future in Europe?”xiii
The main (but not sole) source of the bias is “the violent threat
of jihadists.” Although it is considered racist to say so, most of
the violent episodes of which the media tell us daily involve
Muslims. And it is sad to note that we frequently hear of similar
violence instigated by a cleric who makes such action a focus of his
Friday message to the faithful. It is not a surprise that the prayer
service on that holy day is an important part of their
indoctrination,xiv
for it is the time when the largest number of believers is there and
eager to learn who is oppressing them and what they must do in
response.
So
how did everything begin? And when? I don't know. Was it a Divine
Creation? Was it the logical result of scientific laws? Was there
some other mechanism in play? The question is hard to resolve and
will probably never be answered to everyone's satisfaction. But the
secret of existence and the meaning of life should never be something
that divides us. It should never be the excuse for depriving life of
all meaning. And we should certainly not use a part of our
observance as as tool whose purpose is to oppress others. Especially
not on the day we consider most sacred.
“In
the Beginning G-d created the heaven and the earth.” But it was
for us – all of us – to live with each other. Not only on the
day of rest, but on the rest of the days.
Next
episode: “Hermitage”
– Alone by design or not.
i King
James Bible.
ii Rig
Veda 10.129.1-7, from Science
and the World’s Religions, ed. Patrick McNamara and Wesley J.
Wildman, 2012.
iv Labeling
them as “myths” rather than “narratives” or “accounts”
immediately tells the reader not to believe them. Notwithstanding
the scientific explanation given, which human logic tells us is more
believable than the other narratives, we do not – we cannot –
choose between them on rational grounds.
v Or
even that our concept of “fact” makes any sense when considering
cosmogony.
vi Where
did the particle come from Daddy? And the laws of physics? What's
on the next block beyond the restaurant at the end of the universe?
vii Although
this is not the only view, it, and the works that originated from
it, serves the largest number of individuals. I do not pretend
there are not other understandings of time.
viii Actually
the Jewish Sabbath, from which the concept stems, begins, in
accordance with the biblical description of each day beginning in
the evening, just before sunset on Friday and continues until about
an hour after sunset on Saturday, but for practical purposes it is
usual to consider Saturday as the seventh day, removing
complications that are confusing to some. Notwithstanding the
Bible's decrees, there are those who sanctify the first or the sixth
day of the week – or some other time – for holiness. For some,
the day of rest is weekly – for others the schedule is different.
But the concepts of rest and reflection are the rule.
ix “
… even after the Romans had taken over the oriental seven-day
week, … the Jews were accused of 'laziness.' So little was
Sabbath understood and so much was it resented that many a Greek
city, and once apparently a Roman emperor himself, prohibited its
observance.” From “A Social and Religious History of the Jews,”
volume 1 (second edition), by Salo Baron, Columbia University Press,
1952.
x On
January 14, 2011. I'm sure you remember. But just to remind you,
it was entitled “Klutz or
Kluznik.”
xi It
has to correspond to the solar year of 365 and a quarter (more or
less) days.
xii “Violation”
relates to rules which may not be accepted by others who view
themselves as observant.
xiii WSJ,
June 16, 2014. Essay by Simone Rodan-Benzaquen and Daniel
Schwammenthal. (The paper also included an article on the abduction
of three boys in Israel, raising the question of whether Jews are
safe anywhere.)
xiv The
indoctrination is everywhere, especially in the schools and in the
mosques where children are taught hatred and violence from the
beginning.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.