Israel
Resumes Bombardment of Palestinians
Observes
truce for only six hours
That's
the headline I expect to see on the front page of tomorrow's New York
Times. Perhaps somewhere in a lower paragraph, or on an inside page
well beyond the view of someone whose main interest is in headlines
and lead paragraphs, there will be a brief mention of the fact that
Hamas didn't accept the truce at all, and that it continued to aim
rockets at Israel during the time that no fire was being returned.
(I speak primarily of the Times, by the way, because of its
influence, but the situation is far more extensive.)
And
the article will be accurate in terms of presenting facts. But it
will completely mislead the readership. Actually, it won't mislead
the readership, who are used to this kind of misplaced emphasis and
who approve of it. For them this is the truth that's fit to print;
it's the truth they want to read. The Times sees Israel as the
source of the problem in the Middle East, and trumpets the victimhood
of the Palestinians who fight on bravely, though, despite the billions
contributed to the PA, they lack modern weapons and defenses. It is
a land blockaded by Israel which is starving the Palestinians and
making the area uninhabitable. There is little notice of the long
border of Gaza with Egypt nor the large number of smuggling tunnels
from both Egypt and Israel.
And
in addition to the frequent front page articles bemoaning the fate of
the Palestinians, there are regular editorials and “Op-Ed”
columns which describe the steps Israel must take if there is to be
peace. There are two problems with those columns, however: they
imply, wrongly, that only Israel must act in order for there to be an
end to hostilities, and, even more wrongly, they lead the reader to
believe that if Israel acts peace will result. The refusal of Hamas
to accept the present cease-fire, and the long history of failures by
the Palestinians to respond to Israeli offers of peace make it clear
that agreement is not what Hamas and the PA seek. And the continued
indoctrination of their children to hate Israel and Jews makes it
unlikely that a positive result will be brought about by anything
Israel does.
But
that's not what “spin” is about. “News” articles have become
editorials and reporters are now advocacy journalists. All you need
to do to “subjectivize” the facts is to make whatever supports
your view prominent, and bury what brings it into question. The last
place to look for the news is in the “objective” media. Better
to look in publications that don't hide their bias. At least you
know what you're getting.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.