We've
already reviewed some, but certainly not all, of the expenses assumed
in our names by the government pledged to uphold the Constitution.
The greatest of these are the so-called “entitlements,”i
such as the welfare package, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and
the like.ii
It's a mixed bag. Part of it is shared by the states,iii
while the Federal government is solely responsible for many of the
programs. Indeed, some of it is funded through the donationsiv
of individuals. But the combination of the cost of entitlements and
the debt service for what we owev
is more than can be handled by the implementation of an internet
service so they will not be further addressed here, except to note
that these programs are here to stay. Their promises have been
around too long for us to back out now, and too many people have come
to depend on them. All that we can try to do is to rein them in,
make their administration less burdensome, and implement some of the
cost-saving methods that have been proposed.
But
it's time to return to the use of the internet to reduce the National
Debt, and, more specifically, how we can trim the expense of
collecting revenues. I am most interested in the revenues provided
through the Internal Revenue Service, the IRS.vi
For better or worse, we all deal with it. At least we're supposed
to.
The
tax system is chaotic. And no one understands it although there are
a lot of interpreters who claim they do, or promote their own ability
to play the system. Filling and filing taxes is a big business –
especially for tax franchises and computer software makers. The IRS
is now able to handle returns filed electronically, but that merely
remains an option. Universal internet access should be used to make
this kind of filing mandatory. Forms should be completed on line –
using a government-designed audio/video program guiding taxpayers.
There's a lot of money in it and it makes sense that some of it
should go back to the taxpayers. The program would ask the same
questions as (or possibly better questions than) existing programs
and services. Actually they should be a lot better. It's
reasonable to expect that the IRS's questions will be more
perceptive than someone else's, since no one could possibly
understand IRS regulations better than the IRS,vii
and the forms should be simple enoughviii
for the average citizen to manage on his own. All IRS forms
should be included in the program so that it is (theoretically)
possible to complete the task on your own. Even so, some individuals
may still require “professionals” to do the dirty work for them,
especially for businesses or others who require complex returns, but
if the government program is mandated the rest of us can get a cut of
the action, even if done by a professional.
Requiring
electronic filing of a governmental form, with no option for any kind
of filing requiring expensive human intervention, will provide more
than the saving of money (a Good thing by itself). Instantaneous
auditing of all returns will be possible, as well as immediate
payment. By instituting governmental credit/debit cards the IRS can
rapidly collect what is due, as well as interest payments on what is
owed. And if refunds are warranted, they can be credited
immediately. The credit card accounts that result from this system
can also be used to collect fees for other servicesix
Converting
the existing method of tax collection to an internet/credit account
such as this will allow
the government to identify those who haven't filed their returns.x
As would be the case with voting, machine function would be frozen
if tax forms are not filed. Until the form is completed,xi
what might appear on screen is a notification of the penalty, which
would increase daily, for not filing the tax forms.xii
Prior to the filing date,
for some predetermined period of time, a daily countdown of days
until the deadline would be on screen continuously until filing, and
it may annoy some people enough to file, in order to rid themselves
of the reminder.
The
discussion, however – that of mechanisms of lowering the debt –
cannot be completed without acknowledgment that many jobs will be
lost. It was previously suggested that the workers would be
beneficial to private industry, especially computer construction, but
there could be governmental jobs as well, though some may require
retraining. Many individuals will be needed for computer repair and
internet management, and this will absorb some of the bureaucrats who
won't be needed. Most important, though, will be construction of the
“infrastructure” – an act dear to the hearts of all our people.
Included in such an effort, of course, would be the construction of
communications capabilities, including the burying of overhead wires
and cables which are susceptible to weather damage, and the
protection of the nation' electrical system.xiii
But this is only a small part of what needs to be done. Great
efforts should be undertaken to shore up those areas in which damage
can be anticipated from future episodes of unusually harsh weather.
It will require a large work force to do this, but it will lessen
costs and grief in the future. It may diminish the expenses for
agencies like FEMA.
Most
important in the construction effort would be the building of new
roads across country. Much is said about the inefficiency of the
automobile as a source of transportationxiv
and the need for more public transportation. The reality, however,
is that Americans love their cars. And the personal vehicle can get
someone to the place he wants to go, rather than to a “central”
clearing house inconvenient to everybody. And the individual driver
makes his own schedule. Imagine having modern highways coast to
coast with E-ZPass and never having to stop between Key West and
Point Barrowxv
or wherever. At least not for tolls. The availability of the roads
will create a stimulus for the automobile industry and a need for
additional gasoline, until another power source is perfected. Many
displaced workers could be employed in the shale-oil industry.
Properly managed, shale-oil will make us the greatest producer of gas
in the world, and if that is as much of a boon to our economy as
anticipated, it will certainly have a long-lived and beneficial
effect on our National Debt.
And
that brings us back to where we started. There's been some rambling,
and there's one more topic I want to cover,xvi
but the bottom line is that a national internet capability will offer
the possibility of changing America (for the better). We might even
get our representatives to actually represent us and cut our taxes.
A higher internet may help us lower our safety net – at least what
it costs us.
Enter.
Next
episode: “Oh, Give Me A Home” – Help for the
foreclosed.
i How
these are viewed depends very much on your philosophy. Some see
them as a religious obligation – an act of charity – while
others see them as a moral obligation of the rich toward the poor;
some consider them to be in keeping with the Constitution, though
some view them as contradicting the ideas of the Founding Fathers.
Some don't care about the ideas of the Founding Fathers, and some
simply don't care.
ii Conservatives
argue that the whole system represents redistribution of wealth from
those who have, to those who do not; that the provision of
entitlements furnishes a paving stone (or several stones) on the
road to Socialism. Liberals point out that everyone, even
Conservatives, gains by government programs. (Some might even
contend that Socialism is preferable to Capitalism – but that's a
different discussion.) They're likely to cite such benefits as the
funding of the government itself, the military, road building, and
various subsidies. These, however, are dwarfed by the entitlements
which the government has taken on itself, and, indeed, some of the
programs noted by the Liberals, like the government and the
military, are specifically mandated by the Constitution. (Many of
our citizens would prefer to pay fees for the
non-Constutionally-mandated services if, in exchange, their taxes
were significantly lowered because they were not forced to pay for
services they did not need or want.)
iii Or
imposed on the states. Like “entitlements,” definitions are in
the eye of the beholder.
iv “Donations”
isn't really an accurate description of the funding method of Social
Security since participation is mandatory. In any event, your
donations may not cover the extent of your benefits, and the
difference must be covered by those currently working and by
taxpayers in general.
v Over
sixteen and a half trillion dollars at the time of this writing
(February 13, 2013).
vi The
Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution legalizes the income tax,
but our “representatives” (the legislators), and the bureaucrats
they hire to write the rules, have found ways to soak us that we
would never have approved if given the opportunity. In reality we
understand neither the rules nor the forms.
vii Okay.
You can stop laughing now.
viii Perhaps
it's wishful thinking to credit the IRS with the ability to make
anything simple, but it would be nice if they could.
ix Like
the “co-pay” for computer repair, lottery payments, and the fee
for voting if the individual accepts it.
x It
hasn't been discussed, but a parallel internet mechanism would have
to be instituted for businesses, charities, and other organizations,
so they can receive pertinent information and file necessary
documents.
xi No
matter how long it takes.
xii In
addition to interest on unpaid taxes.
xiii Perhaps
we should consider a second electric grid as well to provide
redundancy in times of disaster.
xiv And
its carbon tireprint.
xv We'll
give Canada a cut if they participate.
xvi See
“Oh, Give Me A Home,” which will appear on March 17th.
I'll bet you can't wait.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.