Homosexualityi
is the answer.
What,
you ask, is the question? Fair enough. But let's begin with some
facts. No. First comes disclosure. I'm heterosexual. I blush to
admit it since it's not fashionable at the present, but I have to
place Truth above my embarrassment. OK. Now that's out of the way.
Facts:
There's
a lot of homosexuality in the world. Conservative estimates place
the number at between one and two percent. So that means that there
probably are at least 100 million individualsii
who would so identify themselves. That doesn't include the bisexual
and trans-sexual population – but who's counting.
Same
sex bonding, moreover, is not limited to humans. According to
Wikipedia,
“Homosexual behavior in animals
is sexual behavior among non-human species that is interpreted as
homosexual or bisexual. This may include sexual activity, courship,
affection, pair bonding, and parenting among same-sex animal pairs.
Research indicates that various forms of this are found throughout
the animal kingdom. As of 1999, nearly 1,500 species, ranging from
primates to gut worms, have been observed engaging in same-sex
behaviors; this is well documented in about 500 species.”
We're
not alone.
Homosexual
behavior has existed as long as people have. Longer when you
consider its presence in other species. It was prominent in ancient
societies and must have been sufficiently influential a few millennia
ago that the Bible had to spend a lot of time excoriating its
practitioners. And the disrepute resulting from theological sources,
as well as the psychological reactions of non-participants, resulted
in widespread condemnation by the governments of societies around the
world. In some placesiii
sodomy merits the death penalty – even today. In many lands it is
simply ignored, although some cultures celebrate it. It's unlikely
that you'll get through an evening of television or the movies
without seeing homosexual characters or hearing homosexual themes –
usually in an approving manner. Yet it wasn't until 2003iv
that the United States Supreme Court struck down anti-sodomy laws,
and the battle over same-sex marriage is still going on. (Back to
disclosure. As I said in a previous essay,v
I'm opposed to homosexuality because of the hijacking of the
language. “Marriage,” “gay,” and “partner,” for example
have been twisted into words with very different meanings from the
past, though the use of new words with more specific meanings could
have preserved past definitions in a recognizable way. The practice
itself is of no interest to me and I have enough problems of my own
without involving myself in those of its adherents.)
However
it doesn't make sense to me. I don't mean to judge the specific
behavior of members of the LGBTQ community. It's the biology that
confuses me. I've learned that it's nature, not nurture, that is the
background of homosexuality, and that it's not a disease but a normal
condition. But what is its origin?
If
it's an inborn characteristic as current teaching tells us, it is
governed by genetics. And beyond that, it should be ruled by the
precepts of evolution. That means that the characteristic is
heritable, and its persistence suggests that it is beneficial to the
continuation of our species.vi
Which doesn't make all that much sense. Homosexual unions are
un(re)productive, and if the behavior is not taught, it is unclear
how it can be transmitted. It should be self-limited, and it should
have disappeared a long time ago. But it didn't.
Is
that proof that evolution doesn't work? That it is an intriguing,
but false, concept? Does it prove that homosexuality is part of a
Divine Plan? That the Creator wants homosexuality to persist? Or
perhaps it indicates that there are mutations that occur frequently
enough to keep the number of homosexuals constant. Whatever.
If
it is part of a Divine Plan, however, it's one we might consider
imitating. As I've noted before,vii
we should be encouraging homosexuality and homosexual unions because
they are of benefit to the world. One of the major problems we face
is the threat of overpopulation and one solution is obvious –
sterile unions. Same-sex unions, or whatever else you want to call
them. Whether we can relate to their “life-style” or not, they
are clearly doing a service for the rest of us, and for that we
should be grateful. We may have a question, but we also have an
answer. The question is about the past. The answer is
about the future.
Next episode: “The Tenth Amendment And “ … all the other Acts and Things … ” -- You know what I mean.
i When
I use the term I'm referring to all the variants of same-sex
bonding, gender dysphoria, and the like. It's just easier to use a
single word, even though I realize that the varieties have many
differences.
ii Give
or take a few tens or hundreds of millions.
iii For
example countries ruled by Sharia law.
v “It
Goes Without Saying,” November 28, 2010
vi That's
what natural selection is all about.
vii “The
New Paradigm,” July 27, 2014. Actually, much of what I'm
saying here I've said before. But I never considered the place of
evolution in the equation, though its role is uncertain. Nor have I
considered mutation as a cause of homosexuality.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.