Tell
me a little about your great-grandmothers on your mother's side.
That's
alright. I can't either.
We
all live in the present. My new great-granddaughter Amalya will live
in the present. My ancestor,
Shlah Hakodesh,i
lived in his present. We pretend that it's not true of us – that
we are working to prepare a better world for our children and
grandchildren – but we're fooling ourselves.ii
Did our ancestors prepare for us?iii
The real truth is that they were concerned with their own problems,
and the reality is that we're thinking about ourselves, not our descendants.
It's
true of all of us – we live “now.” But what that means is a
little more confusing.
If
I never knew my great-grandmothers, you can be certain that I can't
tell you much about the time before I was born, apart from what's in
history books and in cosmology texts. The eternity that preceded me
is all but a blank slate, and the eternity that will follow me is
even more so. We live between eternities.iv
With the help of “futurists” we can make some intelligent
guesses about what is likely in the very near future, but that
period, one that is disappearingly short, will have no ultimate
significance and will fade into a similarly unknown past very
quickly. The truth is that we cannot change the pastv
nor know the future. So why bother?
In
many ways – in almost all ways – we're like the “lower”
animals. They, too, live in the present. They go about their lives
as their instincts direct, with no considerationvi
of the past or the future. “Death” doesn't exist for them. Nor
do previous generations.vii
At least not as far as we know. Those ideas – especially the
concept of death – are burdens of which we alone are aware, and
which we have to bear. In that respect, our ability to think and
understand are psychologically harmful to us.
Why
do we have this capability? What is its origin? The scientists who
have described it and who study it are not certain how it came about,
but the reality is that we have it. We are conscious of more than
just the elements of survival, we're aware of the irrelevant features
of our world – the optional ones that pique our interest or affect
our emotions; we're capable of understanding, analyzing, and
planning. And we know more. So those abilities extend far beyond
what was available to our predecessors. Perhaps that's a good thing,
but often it isn't. It should be, however we're too often controlled
by our own desire to do what we've always done: to live now.
We
have the opportunity and the ability, limited as it may be, to plan
ahead. Unfortunately, instead of looking for the best answers, we
often look for the fastest. We want immediate gratification and
quick answers. We don't want to think. It's better to get all the
information prepared for us. Whether it takes the form of fast food,
Google, or Cliff's Notes, we can't wait. That's what makes us so
susceptible to ready-made information – whether it's from the
media, the “smart” phone, or grandma. And that's why we're
always looking down, at the devices in our hands.viii
We're forever texting or using our latest “apps.” Part of the
reason is that we can't tolerate solitude or silence. We live only
in the present, but we protect ourselves from it. Any distraction
will do.
Some
believe they are doing otherwise. They're working to make the world
better. Better, of course, means the way they want it to be. Too
often they're satisfying their own egos without solving any of the
real problems we face. They're spending much of their time arguing
with other people who would make the world better by doing the
opposite of what they propose. We allow current dogma to dictate the
stands we take, even though, and especially because, we don't always
understand the underlying issues. We believe the “party-line”
ideas to be the best approach available now. If we, or our children
have to change those ideas later because they don't work or if
they're harmful, so be it. We want to believe that it's about the
future, but the present, now, is the focus of our thinking. And we,
not them, want to decide what that will be like.
You
don't remember your great grandmothers? They didn't know you either.
Whatever dreams they may have had about their descendants, they had
neither the knowledge nor the conceit to think they could do so. And
chances are they would have guessed wrong about the way the world
would look, and who we are and what we need. As Yogi Berra said,
“It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future.”
So
it makes sense to live now. It's hard enough to get things right for
ourselves. Amalya will do very well without our help. And her great
grandchildren without hers.
Next episode: “42” – The Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything. (see The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams)
I Author
of “Shnei
Luchot
Habrit”
hence Shlah.
(Hakodesh
means the holy one.) Rabbi Isaiah Horowitz was born in 1565 and
died about 1630.
ii If
we really cared about them and their future we'd think twice before
increasing the national debt that some generation in the future will
have to deal with.
iii For
example, and it's only an example, what steps did our predecessors
in the sixth century (BCE or CE – your choice) take to make our
lives better? Did they even think about it?
iv At
least that's what the scientists say. But do they know any better
than the rest of us?
v As
Big Brother would tell you, that's not really true. All you have to
do is erase a few lines from the history books and you'll change the
past. At least what people believe it to be.
vi Of
which we're aware.
vii It's
somewhat presumptuous of me to believe that animals can't think and
plan, and that they have no knowledge comparable to ours, but that
is the commonly held view. While evolution relies on efforts of the
individual to ensure the longevity of the species, that is by
instinct, not thought. We recognize our inability to converse with
them, but that may be our weakness, not theirs.
viii I
was on the subway recently and all I saw in front of me were people
looking down at their phones or their tablets. Actually that's an
overstatement. Some were sitting with their eyes closed and their
earbuds open. When I was young there was a lineup of open
newspapers. It was the same phenomenon of distraction from reality,
but at least it required more active participation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.