Today
is my wife's and my anniversary. We were married on June 26, 1960.
That's fifty-six years. It was a Sunday. Hanging on the wall is a
reproduction of the New York Times front page from that date, and the
lead story – upper right hand corner – is titled “Senators'
Report Scores Handling of U-2 Incident.” Dates me, doesn't it?
But
the same front page dates the Times as well. There are two
photographs which comprise a little over eleven percent of the front
page – one a poor picture of the back of a Cartier employee and a
broken window (there had been a theft of jewelry valued at $30,000)
and the other an unexciting representation of some Korean protesters
in Japan who opposed a security treaty with the United States. The
photographs were black and white.
For
comparison I looked at the front page of yesterday's paper (May 10,
2016. As you know, I write these essays in advance) and found that
there was about twenty-one percent of it covered with color
pictures – seven in all – including advertisements. (There were
no ads on our wedding day.) Since the Times's first front page
photograph appeared in 1909 (its first photo was in 1896) it's safe
to say that while there were pictures fifty-six years after we were
wed, there was none fifty-six years before. All the editors could
provide were packages of a thousand words each. But those words were
spelled correctly and grammatically presented. Those were the days,
my friend.
Times
(“times,” as well as the New York Times) change. And journalism
changes. The media we once knew have been replaced by the personal
recording of opinions, facts, and photographs by the ubiquitous
reporters of our age – us. While newspapers, magazines, radio, and
television haven't disappeared, far more attention world-wide is paid
to the social media. Billions of people (including journalists and
politicians) have accounts on Facebook®,
Twitter®,
and similar carriers. And very many more have cell phones with
cameras in their pockets so they can take pictures of everyone and
everything around them.
Times,
as I said, change. As is frequently the case the changes were
initiated by technological advancements and society's response to
them. They represent an improvement over prior methods both of
documentation and presentation of information. At least that's the
way they're sold.
Pictures
have been around – or at least documented – for about forty
thousand years. The earliest ones we have are cave paintings. There
may have been pictures before that (pictures probably predated
language) but no archaeological evidence has been found. That won't
be a problem for the archaeologists of the future. Quite the
opposite. There will be too many pictures – most of them “selfies”
by egotistical members of our species, a species likely to change
over the millennia. Those related to the news remain active as long
as the news cycle, but they're archived along with the text. They
last forever. They never disappear.
There
seems to be no end of the pictures posted every day on the internet.
The pictures, for the most part lacking any significance, have turned
social media into an addiction – one that takes away countless
hours of boredom and replaces it with countless hours of pointless
gazing – have replaced language with visual images – some of
which aren't even real. They're “photoshopped.”
Our
vocabulary is decreasing to “like,” “don't like,” “how
cute, and “hashtag.” And “emogis.” There's a little more to
it, but not much. We used to “reach out and touch someone” with
inane speech, but now we do so with even more inane, and repetitive,
photographs which we transmit as soon as they're taken. Who cares?
Apparently a lot of people do, and they devote all their spare time
to gawking at what they've been sent by their countless “friends,”
often friends whom they've never met. And language becomes even more
abbreviated as we move in the direction of one hundred forty
character messages. They make a thousand words seem an unnecessary
luxury, if not completely wasteful.
But
I'm living in the past. That's what happens when you've been married
as long as I. And I like it. Sure we have photos taken when our
children were young, but the memories are far more evocative. Our
imaginations are now disappearing, but we once used them to fill in
the gaps, and flavor our fantasies.
And
we talked to each other face to face, using full sentences. Where
have all the phrases gone?
No comments:
Post a Comment
I know you agree, but you can leave comments anyway.